Connectory: organizational memory for your whole company, plus PR reviews that use it. Free to start.
Stop AI Slop. Govern Your Codebase.
Slop = low-quality AI-generated code that looks fine but hides bugs and debt.
Catch risky AI-generated code before it merges. Make sure every change fits how your company actually works.
Connectory helps your company remember policies, decisions, and ownership across every repository, then checks every pull request against that context.
Genie is your company's living policies and decisions (read and steer from a dashboard, no terminal). SlopBuster is the GitHub reviewer that applies them on every pull request. One platform: Connectory.
2-minute setup · Free for open source · No credit card required
Copilot / Claude / ChatGPT
SlopBuster
Analyzing...
Production Ready
91%
of devs use AI tools
1.7x
more issues in AI code
75%
more logic errors
42%
of code is AI-generated
organizational memory
Your company's memory (not your laptop's)
Claude and Cursor remember what is on one laptop. Connectory remembers your whole company: policies, decisions, ownership, and open questions across every repository.
You are accountable for what your team and its agents ship. You should not have to open a terminal to find out if they were responsible. SlopBuster checks every pull request against that shared company context.
Your policies and decisions stay with you when you change AI tools or models.
Yes, Claude + skills is powerful. We are not asking you to give that up.
Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and a well-maintained AGENTS.md are the right layer for writing code faster on the repos you have open. Connectory does not compete with that. We sit above it: keep your desk tools, add the org brain that survives turnover, model swaps, and repos nobody has cloned on a laptop today.
| Layer | Who it serves | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Coding agents + AGENTS.md / skills | The developer at the desk | Draft, refactor, and explore on repos you have open locally |
| Connectory Genie + SlopBuster | Leaders and everyone accountable for what ships | Remember intent, people, and policies across all repos; govern every PR; dashboard and audit without an IDE |
What Claude remembers vs. what your company remembers
Desk tools help one developer write code. Connectory is built for leaders, compliance, and org-wide rules at pull request time.
| Topic | What desk tools remember (Claude, AGENTS.md, etc.) | What Connectory remembers for your company |
|---|---|---|
| Where the knowledge comes from | What an agent saved, or an index of local code | Server-side ingest of org git, PR, and contributor activity, plus human prose |
| What is stored | Facts, code patterns, conventions (the what) | People, teams, ownership, intent (policies, decisions), and open questions (the why) |
| Who can read and steer it | Developers via IDE, CLI, or MCP client | Any human via dashboard and plain language; machines via PR bot and MCP. Nothing installed to read or steer |
| How up to date it stays | Manual updates or re-index; staleness is the admitted failure mode | Evolves from live activity and curation; a policy change now governs the next review everywhere |
| How much of the org it sees | Per-machine, per-account, per-repo; sees only what is checked out | One server-side graph per org; sees everything; single source of truth |
| What it is for | Make the individual coder faster | Govern the organization: appropriateness, ownership, decisions, onboarding, risk |
CEO / Founder
The fear: We ship faster than ever, and I have no idea if we are building the right things or what walks out the door when someone leaves.
The outcome: A living organizational brain: decisions, ownership, and goals captured as they happen and readable in plain language, no terminal required.
CTO / VP Engineering
The fear: Accountability for AI-code failures lands on me, but I cannot review thousands of agent PRs across dozens of repos myself.
The outcome: Every PR judged for appropriateness against live org policy, per-person and per-agent quality signals, and bus-factor alerts across the fleet.
Compliance / CISO
The fear: Regulators want evidence of why AI acted, inside our perimeter. "AI wrote it" is not a defense.
The outcome: Typed, queryable record of policies, decisions, and evidence. Read and steer from a dashboard with no coding tool installed. SOC 2 Type II; no source code stored.
$1.3T
U.S. knowledge-worker turnover cost per year
70-80%
of enterprise knowledge is tacit, never written down
46%
of AI-code failures default to CTO or VP Eng
12%
of enterprises have dedicated AI governance
81%
report rising production failures from AI-generated code
Sources: Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends (2024); Gartner (2024); CloudBees State of Code Abundance (May 2026), survey of 200+ enterprise technology leaders.
AI writes the code. Org memory governs what ships.
Powered by Connectory Genie: every review pulls live organizational memory at decision time.
Your team writes code with Copilot and Claude. Asking the same tools to review it isn't independence, it's the same perspective twice. Specialized tools are independent, but they only see one repo. SlopBuster is independent, sits across all your org's repos, and checks each PR against your company's policies, decisions, and cross-repo context from Genie.
Context changes what good code is
Stack version
A clean Python 3.9 PR could be an embarrassing misuse of Python 3.12 features your codebase already uses everywhere. Same diff, completely different verdict.
Repo purpose
Is it a web app? A research prototype? Embedded C for an autonomous vehicle? The same architectural shortcut is fine in one and a liability in another.
Company goals
A startup's “ship it and iterate” is a tech behemoth's incident waiting to happen. A research team's clever hack is a production team's maintenance nightmare.
Independence + org view
The AI that wrote the code shouldn't review the code. And your reviewer should see all your repos, not just the one with the open PR. API contract drift, cross-repo duplication, silo-blindness: SlopBuster catches what single-repo tools can't.
Every competitor reviews your diff. Only SlopBuster reviews your diff in context, across your whole org, independently.
Your coding AI writes the PR.
SlopBuster, independent, cross-repo, decides if it belongs.
1.7x
More code issues when AI is involved
GitClear 2024
75%
More logic errors in AI-generated code
Stanford/UIUC Research
42%
Of code is now AI-generated
GitHub 2024
Framework reinvention: This implements a fixed 1-second delay, but your codebase already has exponentialBackoff() in utils/retry.ts that handles jitter, max retries, and circuit breaking.
See SlopBuster in Action
Watch how SlopBuster catches framework reinvention and explains why using existing utilities is better
feat: Add retry logic for API calls
opened 2 hours ago by @junior-dev
Framework reinvention detected
Your PR implements custom retry logic 67 lines. This repo already has RetryableOperation in commons/utils.ts.
Real PR Review Example
A comprehensive review with Quality Radar scoring, findings categorization, and technical debt notes
Implemented APIFY scraper to search profiles based on dynamic keywords
By shivanikakrecha • Approved (with conditions)
Quality Radar
Five core dimensions of code quality
This PR introduces a comprehensive LinkedIn contact search feature integrating Apify with AI-driven match evaluation. It improves the codebase by adding strong type safety and clear separation of concerns, but introduces some technical debt related to unused API fields.
Findings (11)
Technical Debt Notes
Unused API fields 'seniority_levels' and 'section_*' create misleading API surface.
Tight coupling to SimpleLLM.run() return type is fragile and should be documented.
How SlopBuster Works
Two intelligence layers run before and during every review. Without both, it's just another diff reader.
RepoWatch builds your quality profile (runs once, updates continuously)
Before any PR is reviewed, RepoWatch runs a structured discovery sequence. No config required, it figures out everything itself:
The result is a repo_intelligence block injected into every review, containing your stack, language version, established patterns, known weak areas, and folders to skip. This is the difference between a reviewer who has been on the team for months and a contractor who just cloned the repo.
PR triggers 3 bots in parallel
Code Review Bot, Slop Checker Bot (full repo grep access), and Security Review Bot run simultaneously, each with the repo_intelligence block loaded.
Context-specific findings
Every finding references your actual codebase, your version of Python, your patterns, your known weak areas. No generic advice that could apply to any repo.
Teaching chat per finding
Every finding includes a teaching chat grounded in your codebase. Ask why, ask how to fix, ask for a better pattern. The answer uses your code as the example.
See SlopBuster in Action
Real PR review from a production codebase showing Quality Radar, findings, and technical debt tracking.
fix: address critical security issues and code quality improvements
By biyer Approved (with conditions)
Critical captcha logging fixed; improved CORS and auth tests; minor logging and test warnings remain. While some tech-debt remains around logging full SQL queries and payloads, and test brittleness, these are warnings rather than blockers.
Five core dimensions of code quality
Additional Metrics
Every competitor reviews your diff. Only SlopBuster reviews it with org memory behind it.
CodeRabbit, Greptile, and Qodo are independent from your coding AI, that's good. But they still only see one repo at a time and reconstruct context from code. Connectory Genie holds server-side institutional memory (people, policies, decisions). SlopBuster uses it on every PR so review matches how your company works, not only whether code compiles.
Your coding AI writes the PR.
SlopBuster, independent, cross-repo, decides if it belongs.
Core PR & Repo Intelligence, code graphs vs. structured repo intelligence
| Feature | GitHub Copilot | CodeRabbit | SonarQube | Aikido | Greptile | Qodo | Panto AI | Sourcery | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code / dependency graph (cross-file context) | |||||||||
| Structured repo intelligence, purpose, stack version, quality profile (RepoWatch) | |||||||||
| Contextual explanations | |||||||||
| AI slop detection (reinvention, band-aids) | |||||||||
| Progressive feedback (1-3 issues) | |||||||||
| Interactive Q&A per finding | |||||||||
| Zero configuration | |||||||||
| GitHub / GitLab integration |
Context-Aware Governance, org memory (Genie), independence, and cross-repo view
| Feature | GitHub Copilot | CodeRabbit | SonarQube | Aikido | Greptile | Qodo | Panto AI | Sourcery | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repo-type context (app / library / embedded / research) | |||||||||
| Org-type context (startup / enterprise / academia) | |||||||||
| Language version awareness (e.g. Python 3.9 vs 3.12 idioms) | |||||||||
| Stops framework reinvention | |||||||||
| Repo-specific pattern enforcement | |||||||||
| Explains "why" using your code | |||||||||
| Quality Radar scoring (multi-dimension) | |||||||||
| Explicit Technical Debt Notes | |||||||||
| Merge gate / blocking status check | |||||||||
| Cross-repo holistic view (frontend + backend + API contracts) | |||||||||
| Independent from your coding AI tools (not Copilot / Cursor / ChatGPT) | |||||||||
| Organizational memory graph (policies, decisions, ownership, questions) | |||||||||
| Leader-readable dashboard (no IDE / Claude install) | |||||||||
| Autonomous ingest across all org repos (OrgWatch) | |||||||||
| Reviews fit company policies and architecture, not only syntax | |||||||||
| Server-side memory survives engineer turnover |
Your Engineering Command Center
Detect trends before they become problems. Surface risk signals across repos, people, and AI agents, all in one place.
Repos
Health scores, bus factor analysis, and contributor distribution across every repository.
People
Activity scores, AI vs human ratios, and early warning signals for burnout or flight risk.
Executive
Org-wide health, velocity trends, risk dashboard, and natural language trend summaries.
AI Agents
Cost per commit, effectiveness scores, incident rates, and head-to-head agent comparison.
Leadership
Coaching conversation guides, growth tracking, and team health signals.
0
Lenses
Complete visibility
0x
Commons
Shared code multiplier
0d
Trends
Rolling analysis
0%
Coverage
Human + AI unified
Simple, transparent pricing
Unlimited users on every plan. No per-seat fees, no vendor lock-in. Flat pricing that scales with your codebase, not your headcount.
Launchpad
Start shipping cleaner code today
- Unlimited users
- 10 PRs/month
- Public repos only
- Basic quality checks
- Community support
No credit card required
Orbit
Automate code reviews & drive higher quality code
- Unlimited users
- 200 PRs/month included
- 5 private repositories
- Codebase-aware reviews
- AI slop detection
Hyperdrive
Ship faster with fewer bugs and regressions hitting production
- Unlimited users
- 600 PRs/month included
- 20 private repositories
- Quality radar scoring
- Trusted Advisor Q&A
- Elevated compute priority
Interstellar
Enterprise governance with security, compliance & risk management
- Unlimited users
- 1,500 PRs/month included
- 50 private repositories
- Custom quality rules
- Merge gate enforcement
- Priority compute
- SSO / SAML / SCIM
- Self-hosted option
Need an enterprise plan with unlimited PRs, unlimited repos, and custom integrations? Contact sales.
Add-on packages
Secret detection, vulnerability scanning, insecure pattern detection
PR cycle benchmarking, merge confidence, throughput trends
Custom rules, org-wide standards, merge gates
Dedicated Slack, faster compute, quarterly reports
Join Our Community
Connect with developers who care about code quality. Get help, share feedback, and help shape the future of Connectory.
Keep Claude. Add the org brain.
Govern what ships.
Connectory Genie remembers your policies and decisions. SlopBuster enforces them on every PR. Start free in minutes.
How Genie + SlopBuster work together
Free for open source. No credit card required.