For DevSecOps & AppSec

Review AI-Assisted Code With Security Context in the Pull Request

SlopBuster examines pull-request changes for risky implementation patterns and explains its findings with file and line context. Guardian turns your chosen review threshold into a GitHub check.

Exact revisionreviewed against repository and organization context
Structured Findings
Review Lifecycle Controls
OWASP Top 10 Coverage
Shift-Left by Default

Where AI-Assisted Review Gets Difficult

Generated code can look plausible while missing an authorization check, using the wrong API, or ignoring a local engineering decision.

Plausible Code Can Still Be Risky

An assistant may suggest hardcoded credentials, unsafe deserialization, weak authorization boundaries, or an outdated library pattern. Reviewers need the risky behavior called out in the changed code, not a guess about who wrote it.

Static Rules Do Not Carry Organization Intent

A scanner can identify known patterns, but it does not automatically know why your team chose a boundary, which service owns an API, or which exception was approved. That context changes how a finding should be judged.

Review Volume Competes With Investigation Time

AppSec teams need to focus on high-impact changes and ambiguous findings. A structured first pass helps them decide where deeper investigation is worth their time.

Pull-Request Analysis With Repository Context

Connectory brings code findings, organization knowledge, and merge policy into the GitHub review flow.

SlopBuster

Security-Relevant Code Findings

SlopBuster examines the diff and surrounding repository context for patterns such as unsafe query construction, path handling, missing authorization checks, exposed secrets, and risky configuration changes.

Guardian

Policy-Aware Merge Checks

Set the finding threshold that should pass, fail, or require review. Guardian reports that result as a GitHub check that can participate in your existing branch-protection rules.

Org Dashboard

Finding and Ownership Trends

Use the Org Dashboard to explore recurring findings, repository ownership, review decisions, and unresolved questions across the organization.

GitHub App

Review Where Developers Already Work

Install the Connectory GitHub App on selected repositories. Findings and the policy result appear on the pull request, alongside the checks and conversations your developers already use.

Security Analysis in the Pull-Request Flow

Connectory adds a structured review and policy result to your existing GitHub pull-request flow.

1

Developer Opens a Pull Request

When a pull request opens or its head changes, the Connectory GitHub App submits that captured revision for review.

2

SlopBuster Analyzes Security Patterns

SlopBuster reads the diff and available repository context, then reports specific findings with file references, evidence, severity, and recommended next steps.

3

Guardian Enforces Your Merge Policy

Guardian evaluates the review result against your configured threshold and reports a passing, failing, or needs-review check. GitHub branch rules remain the merge authority.

4

Dashboard Tracks Security Trends Over Time

Review results contribute to the organization view, where AppSec can investigate recurring patterns, repository ownership, and unresolved findings.

What the Review Flow Adds

Use Connectory to make findings easier to inspect, policy decisions easier to apply, and review history easier to revisit.

Evidence

Specific findings tied to files, lines, and the reviewed revision.

Context

Repository and organization knowledge available during review.

Decision

A policy result that fits into GitHub branch protection.

History

Review outcomes and open questions visible beyond one pull request.

Bring a Representative Pull Request

We will show how SlopBuster investigates the change, how Guardian reports your policy decision, and what AppSec can examine in the organization view.