AI Code Governance for Mission-Critical Software
Connectory connects organization policy and engineering decisions to pull-request review. Program leaders can examine findings, ownership, and review history while GitHub remains the place where developers approve changes.
The Governance Gap in Government AI Development
Mission software requires reviewers to understand policy, ownership, system boundaries, and the reason behind earlier decisions. AI-assisted changes do not remove that responsibility.
Reviewers Need More Than the Diff
A change can be locally correct and still conflict with a program decision, interface boundary, or repository-specific rule. That context needs to be available when the pull request is reviewed.
Generated Dependencies Need Investigation
Coding assistants can suggest packages, APIs, and configuration patterns without knowing your approved sources or deployment constraints. Reviewers need those references surfaced and checked against current program context.
Approval History Often Misses the Why
A merge record may identify the approver without preserving the relevant policy, finding, exception, or ownership decision. Program reviews are stronger when that rationale remains connected to the change.
Apply Program Context During Code Review
Connectory gives developers, reviewers, and program leaders a shared record of the knowledge and decisions surrounding connected repositories.
Context-Aware Pull-Request Review
SlopBuster investigates the captured revision for risky implementation patterns, incorrect assumptions, missing tests, and conflicts with the repository and organization context it can access.
Program-Defined Merge Checks
Configure the review result that should pass, fail, or require attention for a repository. Guardian reports that policy result as a GitHub check, and your branch rules retain merge authority.
Program-Level Context Across Repositories
Use the Org Dashboard to examine repository ownership, policy decisions, findings, relationships, and open questions across the connected program scope.
Deployment Architecture Review
Review identity, network, repository access, data handling, and service dependencies with our team before selecting a deployment pattern. The briefing focuses on your actual boundary and operational requirements.
Evaluate Connectory Against Your Program Requirements
Start with the system boundary and repository workflow, then validate policy behavior and evidence with your program stakeholders.
Review the System Boundary
Document the repositories, identities, network paths, data classes, and external services involved in the proposed workflow. Confirm the deployment pattern with the teams responsible for authorization and operations.
Translate Program Policy Into Review Rules
Work with your program and engineering stakeholders to define finding thresholds, required checks, and approval paths for the repositories in scope.
Review the Captured Pull-Request Revision
SlopBuster reports findings for the exact revision under review. Guardian evaluates the result against the configured threshold and returns a GitHub check for your branch rules to use.
Inspect Findings and Decision History
Use the dashboard to inspect review results, organization context, owners, decisions, and open questions. Your program team decides how that record contributes to its evidence package.
Review the System Boundary
Document the repositories, identities, network paths, data classes, and external services involved in the proposed workflow. Confirm the deployment pattern with the teams responsible for authorization and operations.
Translate Program Policy Into Review Rules
Work with your program and engineering stakeholders to define finding thresholds, required checks, and approval paths for the repositories in scope.
Review the Captured Pull-Request Revision
SlopBuster reports findings for the exact revision under review. Guardian evaluates the result against the configured threshold and returns a GitHub check for your branch rules to use.
Inspect Findings and Decision History
Use the dashboard to inspect review results, organization context, owners, decisions, and open questions. Your program team decides how that record contributes to its evidence package.
What the Program Can Evaluate
A technical briefing gives your program concrete material to review across code analysis, policy, identity, data handling, and operations.
Boundary
Document the identities, repositories, network paths, and services in scope.
Review
Inspect findings against a captured pull-request revision.
Policy
Test how your thresholds and GitHub branch rules behave together.
Evidence
Review the available findings, owners, decisions, and organization context.
Request a Government Deployment Architecture Briefing
Bring your repository workflow, system boundary, and review requirements. We will walk through the Connectory architecture and identify the questions your program needs answered before a pilot.